RCTI Meaning: Australia's Recipient-Created Tax Invoice

RCTI stands for recipient-created tax invoice — a tax invoice that the buyer issues to the supplier, instead of the supplier issuing it to the buyer. The recipient of a taxable supply creates and issues the document, and the supplier is then prohibited from issuing their own tax invoice for that same supply.

This reverses the standard invoicing process under Australia's Goods and Services Tax system, shifting the documentation responsibility from the supplier to the recipient of goods or services.

Four conditions must be met before an RCTI arrangement can be used:

1. Both parties must be registered for GST with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).
2. A written RCTI agreement must be in place between the supplier and the recipient before any RCTIs are issued.
3. The supply type must be eligible under the Recipient Created Tax Invoice Determination 2023 (Legislative Instrument 2023/20), as determined by the ATO Commissioner.
4. The recipient must be able to determine the value of the supply at the time the invoice is created.

These conditions exist because RCTIs are not a general-purpose alternative to normal invoicing. They apply to specific commercial situations where the buyer genuinely holds the information needed to calculate what is owed. The fourth condition is the general route into the arrangement; government related entities and large business entities qualify on their status instead, whoever works out the price, as the next section explains.

Consider how certain agricultural transactions work in practice. A grain grower delivers wheat to a bulk handling facility, where the silo operator weighs the load, tests moisture content, and assigns a grade. The grower does not know the final receivable amount until the buyer completes that assessment. Similarly, a livestock seller consigns cattle to a saleyard, and the selling agent determines the price only after the auction closes. In both cases, the buyer or agent is the party with the data needed to produce an accurate invoice. Requiring the supplier to issue the tax invoice would mean waiting for the buyer to relay that information back, adding an unnecessary step to a process the buyer can complete directly.

Under normal GST rules, the supplier issues a tax invoice to the buyer, and that document supports the buyer's input tax credit claim. With an RCTI, this responsibility flips. The recipient prepares the invoice, labels it "Recipient Created Tax Invoice" (not "Tax Invoice"), and includes both parties' Australian Business Numbers. The supplier receives a copy but does not issue their own invoice for the same supply. This distinction matters for compliance: if a document is not clearly marked as recipient-created, or if it omits the supplier's ABN, it does not meet the requirements for a valid RCTI. For a detailed comparison of what goes on a standard document, see the standard Australian tax invoice requirements that apply when the supplier retains invoicing responsibility.

Standard Tax Invoice vs. RCTI at a Glance

	Standard tax invoice	Recipient-created tax invoice
Who creates it	The supplier	The recipient (buyer)
Document label	"Tax Invoice"	"Recipient Created Tax Invoice"
ABNs shown	The supplier's ABN	Both parties' ABNs
Written agreement	Not required	Required, and current when the RCTI is issued
The other party's invoice	The buyer issues nothing	The supplier must not issue a tax invoice for the same supply
Supplies covered	Any taxable supply	Only taxable supplies falling within the Commissioner's Determination
Issuing deadline	Within 28 days of the buyer requesting one	Within 28 days of the supply, or of the recipient determining its value
BAS labels	Supplier 1A, buyer 1B	Supplier 1A, recipient 1B

---

Eligible Supplies and Recipients Under the RCTI Determination 2023

Not every transaction between two GST-registered businesses qualifies for RCTI treatment. The third condition turns on the Commissioner's Determination, formally the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax): Recipient Created Tax Invoice Determination 2023 (Legislative Instrument 2023/20), made under subsection 29-70(3) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999. It consolidated and repealed 50 earlier industry-specific determinations dating from 2015 to 2017 — the separate instruments that had covered quarry operators, publishers, vehicle dealers, horseracing clubs and dozens of other trades.

The consolidation changed the shape of the test. Rather than listing industries, section 6 of the Determination sets out three classes of recipient that may issue an RCTI for a taxable supply, provided both parties are registered for GST when the RCTI is issued.

Business Entities That Determine the Value of the Supply

This is the limb most closely associated with RCTIs in practice, and the 2023 Determination states it as a general test: any GST-registered business entity that receives a taxable supply and determines the value of that supply may issue an RCTI for it. Agricultural produce is the classic case, because the value depends on quality, weight, or grade that can only be assessed at the point of delivery. Grain receival, livestock sales, and sugar cane milling are the most common examples. In each case, the supplier cannot reasonably issue a tax invoice at the time of supply because they do not yet know the final value. The practical workflows for these industries are covered in detail below.

Government-Related Entities

Government bodies and agencies that receive taxable supplies can use RCTIs for their procurement and payment arrangements. This covers a range of transactions including contract payments for services, grant disbursements, and general procurement where a Commonwealth, state, or local government entity is the recipient. Unlike the limb above, a government related entity does not need to be the party that works out the price — its status alone qualifies it, whoever determines the value.

Government departments often prefer RCTIs because they allow centralised control over invoice accuracy and payment timing, particularly when dealing with high volumes of suppliers across diverse programs. Businesses supplying government entities should also be aware that federal agencies are progressively adopting Peppol e-invoicing under Australia's B2G mandate, which affects how invoices — including RCTIs — are transmitted to government buyers.

Large Business Entities

Entities that meet or exceed the large business entity turnover condition — GST turnover at or above the tax period turnover threshold — can also use RCTIs for eligible supplies they receive. The Determination extends this to members of a GST group that includes a qualifying entity, and to joint venture operators where the operator or a participant qualifies. Like government bodies, large business entities qualify on status rather than on determining the value, giving large buyers the ability to generate tax invoices on behalf of their suppliers where both parties agree.

This category is particularly relevant for mining companies, large retailers, and other corporations that receive supplies from numerous smaller businesses and need a streamlined invoicing process. Buyers at that scale are usually above the $100 million income threshold as well, which carries a separate obligation to report how quickly they pay their small business suppliers each half-year.

Prerequisites Across All Three Classes

Regardless of which class applies, two baseline requirements must be met before an RCTI arrangement can proceed:

• Both parties must be registered for GST. If either the supplier or recipient loses their GST registration, the arrangement is no longer valid.
• Both parties must hold an Australian Business Number (ABN). The ABN requirement ensures that both entities are identifiable within the tax system and that the ATO can match the RCTI to the correct taxpayer records.

---

What the Written RCTI Agreement Must Include

A valid written agreement between the buyer and supplier is one of the four mandatory conditions for issuing recipient-created tax invoices. This is not a formality. Without a compliant agreement in place before the RCTI is issued, the document is invalid, and the buyer loses any entitlement to claim input tax credits on the supply.

Section 8 of the Determination prescribes exactly what the agreement must contain. Anything beyond that list is commercially sensible drafting, not a legal requirement — and confusing the two is a common source of both over-engineered agreements and invalid ones.

The agreement must specify the taxable supplies it relates to. This is the requirement most often treated as optional, and it is not. The agreement has to identify the supplies it covers. If you have a mixed relationship where some supplies use standard invoicing and others use RCTIs, the agreement must make that boundary explicit; ambiguity here does not merely lead to disputes, it puts the covered supplies in doubt.

The agreement must be current when the RCTI is issued. An expired, terminated, or superseded agreement will not support an RCTI issued after the fact. This is why agreements with a fixed term need a review process attached to them, and why a lapsed agreement invalidates every document issued under it from that date forward.

Both parties acknowledge their GST registration. The agreement must confirm that the recipient (buyer) and the supplier are both registered for GST at the time the agreement is entered into. This matters because RCTIs can only be issued between GST-registered parties, and the agreement itself must reflect that status.

The recipient will issue RCTIs for the covered supplies. The agreement must state clearly that the buyer takes on the obligation of creating tax invoices for the supplies it receives from the supplier. This shifts the invoicing responsibility from the supplier to the buyer.

The supplier will not issue standard tax invoices for those same supplies. This prevents duplicate invoicing. If both parties issue tax invoices for the same supply, it creates GST reporting errors and potential duplicate credit claims. The agreement must explicitly prevent the supplier from issuing their own tax invoices for any supply covered by the RCTI arrangement.

Each party must notify the other if their GST registration status changes. The Determination states this as two separate conditions — the supplier will notify the recipient if it ceases to be registered, and the recipient will notify the supplier if it ceases to be registered. A change in GST registration status invalidates the RCTI arrangement going forward, so timely notification is essential to avoid issuing documents that carry no legal weight.

The Mandatory Agreement Checklist

Run a draft agreement against this list before the first RCTI is issued. Every item comes from section 8 of the Determination; if any one is missing, the documents issued under the agreement are not valid RCTIs.

• Specifies the taxable supplies the agreement relates to
• Is current at the time each RCTI is issued
• Contains an acknowledgment from the supplier that it is registered for GST when it enters into the agreement
• Contains an acknowledgment from the recipient that it is registered for GST when it enters into the agreement
• States that the recipient can issue RCTIs in respect of those supplies
• States that the supplier will not issue tax invoices in respect of those supplies
• States that the supplier will notify the recipient if it ceases to be registered for GST
• States that the recipient will notify the supplier if it ceases to be registered for GST

Embedding the Agreement in the RCTI Itself

The Determination allows a second route. Instead of a separate signed document, the agreement terms can be embedded in the RCTI. An embedded agreement must declare that it applies to the supplies the RCTI relates to, that the recipient will issue RCTIs for them, that the supplier will not issue tax invoices for them, that both parties are registered for GST and will notify the other if that ceases to be true, that the supplier will notify the recipient within 21 days of receiving the RCTI if they do not accept the agreement, and that accepting the RCTI constitutes accepting the agreement's terms.

That 21-day window is the practical difference between the two routes. With a separate agreement, consent is established before the first RCTI is issued. With an embedded agreement, consent is presumed unless the supplier objects, and the RCTI is only valid if no such notice has been received within 21 days. High-volume buyers often prefer the embedded route because it removes the need to chase signatures from hundreds of suppliers; the trade-off is that every RCTI carries the agreement text and the recipient has to monitor for objections.

Structuring the Agreement Beyond the Minimum

Meeting the mandatory requirements above keeps you legally compliant, but a well-drafted agreement anticipates real-world complications. Consider including:

• How adjustments and corrections will be handled. Supplies don't always go smoothly. Prices change, goods are returned, quantities differ from what was originally agreed. Setting out the process for issuing adjustment notes when the taxable amount changes is not a section 8 requirement, but the obligation to issue those adjustment notes exists regardless, and agreeing the mechanics in advance saves argument later.
• The period the agreement covers. Open-ended agreements are permissible, but setting a defined term with a review date helps both parties reassess whether the arrangement still works and whether GST registration statuses remain current.
• Amendment and termination procedures. Spell out how either party can modify the scope of the agreement or end it entirely. Include notice periods so neither side is caught issuing invalid documents after the arrangement has lapsed.
• Record-keeping obligations. While both parties are already required by law to retain the agreement, reinforcing this in the document itself reduces the risk of one party discarding records prematurely.

Using the ATO's Standard Template

The ATO publishes NAT 73657, the Recipient-created tax invoices form, as a template for creating RCTIs. It is worth being precise about what this form is, because it is often described as an agreement template and it is more than that: it carries the agreement terms embedded in the invoice itself, so a single completed form serves as both the tax invoice and the written agreement. The ATO's guidance is that you can use it as-is, or as a reference for the information your own RCTI has to carry.

For more complex relationships, particularly those involving multiple supply categories or specific adjustment procedures, businesses commonly draft a separate agreement and use the NAT 73657 only as a checklist of what the document must say.

Regardless of whether you use the ATO form or draft a custom agreement, the recipient must retain the original RCTI or a copy of it for five years, and both parties should keep the written agreement for the same period under the standard GST record-keeping rules. This applies even if the arrangement is terminated before that time.

---

Mandatory Fields on a Recipient-Created Tax Invoice

An RCTI that omits a single required element risks being treated as an invalid tax invoice under the GST Act. Before issuing or accepting one, check every document against this complete list of mandatory fields.

Required fields on every RCTI:

1. The words "Recipient Created Tax Invoice" displayed prominently on the document. Using "Tax Invoice" alone is one of the most common errors in practice, and it can invalidate the document entirely. The label must make clear that the buyer, not the supplier, created this invoice.

2. The supplier's ABN. Unlike a standard tax invoice where only the supplier's ABN appears, an RCTI requires identification of both parties.

3. The recipient's (buyer's) ABN. This dual-ABN requirement is unique to RCTIs and reflects the shared responsibility both parties hold for the document's accuracy.

4. The date of issue.

5. A description of the supply, including the quantity and price of what was supplied.

6. The GST amount payable on the supply.

7. The extent to which the supply is a taxable supply. Where a single delivery covers both taxable and non-taxable items, the RCTI must identify which portion attracts GST and which does not.

8. A statement that the GST is payable by the supplier. This is the field most often missed, and it is the one that does the distinctive work: because the buyer produced the document, it has to say on its face that the GST liability still sits with the seller.

A regular tax invoice carries only the supplier's ABN because the supplier issues it. An RCTI carries both ABNs because the buyer is issuing a tax document on the supplier's behalf. Both parties need to be identifiable so the ATO can trace GST obligations in either direction.

A Worked RCTI Layout

The following is an illustrative layout, not an official form — the ATO's NAT 73657 is the authoritative template. Party names and ABNs are invented. The bracketed numbers map each element back to the mandatory field list above.

=====================================================================
  RECIPIENT CREATED TAX INVOICE                                  [1]
  This invoice was created by the recipient. The GST shown is
  payable by the supplier.                                       [8]
=====================================================================

  RECIPIENT (buyer)        Northbrook Livestock Exchange Pty Ltd
                           ABN 12 345 678 901                    [3]

  SUPPLIER (seller)        Yarrawonga Pastoral Co
                           ABN 98 765 432 109                    [2]

  Date of issue            14 November 2025                      [4]
  Sale date                6 November 2025
  Value determined         12 November 2025   (28-day clock runs
                                               from this date)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
  DESCRIPTION                                                    [5]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Cattle, 42 head, sale lot 2211
  Total live weight        20,412 kg
  Rate                     $3.20 per kg
                                                    Amount  $65,318.40

  Taxable supply: 100% of the above                              [7]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Subtotal (GST exclusive)                                  $65,318.40
  GST (10%)                                                  $6,531.84  [6]
  TOTAL PAYABLE                                             $71,850.24
=====================================================================

Two details in that layout are worth dwelling on. The value determined date, not the sale date, is what starts the 28-day clock here, because the price was only settled once the lot was weighed and graded. And the taxable supply line is not decoration: on a delivery that mixed taxable and non-taxable items it would have to identify which lines attract GST, and the GST amount would be calculated on those lines alone.

The 28-Day Issuing Window

An RCTI must be issued within 28 days of the supply being made or the value of that supply being determined, whichever comes later. That second trigger point matters significantly in industries where the final value is not known at the time of delivery.

Consider grain delivered to a receival site. The farmer delivers the load, but the final price depends on grading results for protein content, moisture, and screenings. The 28-day clock starts from the date the grade and price are determined, not the delivery date. The same logic applies to mineral ore subject to assay, livestock priced after carcass grading, or any supply where a quality assessment adjusts the final value.

Consequences of Missing Fields

If any mandatory field is absent, the document may fail to qualify as a valid tax invoice under Division 29 of the GST Act. The practical consequences flow in both directions:

• For the recipient (buyer): Without a valid tax invoice, you cannot claim input tax credits for the GST component of the purchase. The ATO can deny the credit on review, and you may need to obtain a corrected document to support the claim.
• For the supplier: An invalid RCTI creates uncertainty around GST reporting. The supplier's obligation to report and remit GST on the supply still exists regardless of document validity, but reconciling that obligation against a defective document complicates BAS preparation and increases audit risk.

Getting these fields right at the point of creation is far simpler than correcting documents retrospectively, particularly when dealing with hundreds of transactions across a harvest season or a long-running mining contract.

---

How RCTIs Work in Agriculture, Mining, and Commission Arrangements

RCTIs exist because certain industries have a structural information gap: the supplier delivers goods or services, but only the recipient can determine their final value. Understanding how this plays out in practice helps you implement RCTI arrangements that match your actual operational workflows.

Agriculture

Agriculture is the largest sector using RCTIs in Australia. With the National Farmers' Federation reporting that Australia's farm gate production value is forecast to reach $101.4 billion in 2025-26, the volume of transactions flowing through RCTI arrangements is substantial. Grain deliveries to bulk handlers and livestock sales through saleyards or abattoirs both follow the same pattern: the buyer weighs, grades, and prices the product after delivery, then issues the RCTI once those variables are confirmed.

Sugar cane adds another layer of complexity. Growers deliver cane to a sugar mill, where the mill measures tonnage and tests for CCS (commercial cane sugar) content. Payment is calculated based on both the weight delivered and the sugar content extracted, neither of which the grower can independently verify at the point of delivery. The mill issues the RCTI once it has completed its assessments.

Farm businesses on the receiving end of RCTIs are also typically buyers of tractors, headers, and irrigation equipment, and many will want to fold those purchases into an IAWO-eligible asset register built directly from supplier invoices so the same year's documentation supports both GST and depreciation positions.

Mining

Mining RCTI arrangements operate on the same principle as agriculture but with different measurement variables. A mining company extracts ore and delivers it to a buyer or processing facility. The delivered material's value depends on assay results, which are laboratory analyses that determine metal content, purity levels, and quality grading.

A gold miner delivering ore concentrate, for example, does not know the precise gold content per tonne until the buyer's laboratory completes its assay. The same applies to base metals, rare earths, and mineral sands, where the commercial value hinges on chemical composition that requires specialised testing. The buyer issues the RCTI once assay results confirm the value of the delivery, which can occur days or even weeks after the physical handover.

Commission Arrangements

Commission-based relationships reverse the typical dynamic. Here, the principal (the party paying the commission) determines the amount owed because they hold the sales data from which the commission is calculated.

A real estate agency paying commission to a subcontracted agent, or a manufacturer paying sales commission to a distributor, calculates the commission as a percentage of sales achieved during the period. Because the principal controls the sales records and determines the commission value, they issue the RCTI to the agent rather than waiting for the agent to invoice them.

Businesses operating commission arrangements should be aware that principals paying commissions may also need to comply with Australia's taxable payments annual reporting obligations, which require reporting payments made to contractors in certain industries to the ATO.

Government Grants, Procurement, and Insurance

Government agencies can use RCTIs when they are the recipient of taxable supplies under contract. This is particularly common in grant arrangements where the government body determines the final payment amount based on deliverables met, milestones achieved, or acquittal of funding conditions. The supplier performs the work, but the government agency assesses completion against agreed criteria and calculates the payment, then issues the RCTI reflecting that determined value.

Insurance claims settlements can also use RCTI arrangements where the insurer determines the claim value. The insurer assesses the loss, calculates the settlement amount, and issues the RCTI to the claimant rather than waiting for the claimant to invoice for an amount they did not determine.

---

How RCTIs Affect BAS Reporting

RCTI arrangements shift the invoicing responsibility from seller to buyer, and that shift flows directly into how both parties handle their Business Activity Statement. Understanding which labels apply to each side prevents misreporting and ensures GST obligations are met correctly.

Recipient (buyer) BAS reporting

As the party issuing the RCTI, the recipient reports GST from those documents at Label 1B (GST on purchases) on their BAS. This is where input tax credits are claimed for acquisitions covered by the RCTI arrangement.

The recipient's GST records must include:

• Copies of every RCTI issued under the arrangement
• The written RCTI agreement with each supplier
• Supporting documentation for the calculation of supply values (e.g., weighbridge dockets, assay reports, commission statements)

Because the recipient controls the invoicing process, they also control the timing. RCTIs must be issued within 28 days of the supply or within 28 days of determining the consideration, whichever applies. Late issuance creates problems for both parties, not just the supplier.

Supplier (seller) BAS reporting

The supplier reports GST on RCTI-covered supplies at Label 1A (GST on sales) on their BAS. The RCTI received from the buyer serves as the supplier's tax document for that transaction. Under the written agreement, the supplier is prohibited from issuing their own tax invoice for the same supply, so the RCTI is the sole record supporting their GST on sales reporting.

This creates a critical dependency: the supplier relies entirely on the buyer to produce the document that substantiates their BAS position. If the buyer fails to issue the RCTI within the required timeframe, the supplier has no compliant tax invoice to support the GST they must report. The obligation to account for GST on the supply still exists, but the supplier lacks the documentation ordinarily needed to reconcile their return.

Both parties should actively monitor RCTI issuance timing. Suppliers in particular should follow up promptly if an expected RCTI has not arrived, rather than waiting until BAS preparation to discover the gap.

GST-free and mixed supplies

An RCTI can only be issued for a taxable supply. This is easy to miss because it is never stated as a prohibition — it is built into the drafting. Section 6 of the Determination frames every permission around "the recipient of a taxable supply", and section 8 requires the written agreement to specify "the taxable supplies to which it relates". A supply that is entirely GST-free, such as certain unprocessed food sold for human consumption, or entirely input-taxed, is not a taxable supply, and no RCTI arises for it. The parties can still exchange a buyer-produced remittance advice or payment summary covering that supply — there is nothing wrong with the commercial document — but it is not a tax invoice, and there is no input tax credit for it to support.

Mixed deliveries are the case that actually comes up in agriculture, and they are handled on the face of the document rather than by excluding it. Where a single delivery covers both taxable and non-taxable items, the RCTI must clearly identify which items are taxable (the seventh mandatory field above) and show GST on the taxable portion only. The non-taxable component is still reported: GST-free sales at Label G3 for the supplier and GST-free purchases at Label G10 for the recipient, with only the taxable portion flowing to Labels 1A and 1B.

The recipient must retain the original RCTI or a copy for five years, and both parties should keep the written RCTI agreement for the same period, consistent with standard GST record-keeping obligations.

---

When RCTI Arrangements Break Down: GST Lapses, Invalid Documents, and Corrections

RCTI arrangements are not set-and-forget. Several real-world scenarios can invalidate an otherwise compliant arrangement, exposing both parties to lost credits, incorrect BAS reporting, and potential ATO scrutiny.

GST Registration Lapses

The moment either party ceases to be registered for GST, the RCTI arrangement becomes invalid immediately. The written agreement already requires both parties to notify each other of any change in registration status, but in practice, notification does not always happen promptly.

When a supplier's GST registration lapses:

• Any RCTIs issued after the lapse date are invalid, regardless of whether the recipient was aware of the change
• The recipient cannot claim input tax credits on those invalid documents
• The arrangement must be suspended or terminated until the supplier re-registers, if they intend to do so
• If the supplier does re-register, a new written RCTI agreement should be executed before resuming

This is a particularly acute risk in seasonal agricultural supply chains. A wool grower or grain supplier operating below the $75,000 GST threshold between seasons may voluntarily cancel their registration, then re-register when the next harvest or shearing cycle begins. Buyers who continue issuing RCTIs during the gap period without verifying registration status will hold a stack of invalid documents and no entitlement to the input tax credits they may have already reported.

Periodic verification of the other party's GST registration is prudent. The ABR (Australian Business Register) allows free online lookups of current GST registration status by ABN. Building a quarterly or seasonal verification step into your accounts payable workflow significantly reduces exposure.

Invalid RCTI Documents

An RCTI that fails to meet the mandatory requirements under the GST Act is not a valid tax invoice, full stop. Common errors that render an RCTI invalid include:

• Missing mandatory fields such as the supplier's ABN, the GST amount, or the quantity/description of the supply
• Incorrect labelling: marking the document as "Tax Invoice" instead of "Recipient Created Tax Invoice." The specific wording matters because it establishes which party created the document and bears responsibility for its accuracy
• No valid written agreement in place at the time the RCTI was issued, or an agreement that has expired or been terminated

The consequences of invalid RCTIs flow in both directions. The recipient loses entitlement to input tax credits for any amount shown on the invalid document. The supplier may face complications with their own GST reporting if they have relied on the RCTI figures to calculate their GST liability.

Where an error is identified on a single document, the practical remedy is to issue a corrected RCTI that meets all requirements and to adjust the relevant BAS period. If invalid RCTIs have been issued over multiple BAS periods (as can happen when a GST registration lapse goes undetected), the recipient should lodge revised activity statements for each affected period and may need to consider a voluntary disclosure to the ATO where the overclaimed input tax credits are material. Professional advice is prudent before retrospective corrections given the potential penalty implications.

Adjustment Notes

Post-issuance changes to the value of a supply are common in RCTI arrangements. A grain delivery may be graded differently after laboratory testing. Livestock weights may be adjusted. Commission calculations may be revised after returns or cancellations. When the taxable value of the supply changes after the original RCTI was issued, the recipient must issue an adjustment note.

Adjustment notes under an RCTI arrangement follow similar rules to the original document:

• The adjustment note must identify itself as recipient-created
• It must include both parties' ABNs
• It must clearly reference the original RCTI and state the nature and amount of the adjustment
• The GST adjustment must be reported in the BAS period in which the adjustment event occurs

Failing to issue adjustment notes, or issuing them incorrectly, creates a mismatch between the GST reported by the supplier and the input tax credits claimed by the recipient.

---

How Australia's RCTI Compares to International Self-Billing

For businesses that also operate in other jurisdictions, Australia's RCTI mechanism is not unique. The underlying concept of self-billing, where the buyer issues the invoice on the supplier's behalf, exists across multiple jurisdictions, though the implementation details differ.

In EU VAT countries, self-billing allows buyers to issue invoices on behalf of suppliers under a bilateral agreement. The structural similarity to Australia's system is clear, but EU self-billing is governed by each member state's domestic VAT legislation rather than a single Commissioner's Determination. The EU model is generally broader in scope, permitting self-billing across a wider range of supply types as long as both parties agree and the member state's conditions are met.

The UK's HMRC self-billing provisions impose their own distinct requirements, including specific record-keeping obligations and conditions around the supplier's VAT registration status. Latin American regimes can be even more prescriptive, as shown by Chile's buyer-issued factura de compra electronica rules for cambio de sujeto purchases, where the buyer-generated document sits inside a specific tax-document framework rather than a general commercial self-billing agreement. Kenya's buyer-initiated invoicing process for small-scale sellers is another example of a narrower model, because it only applies when the supplier falls under the KES 5 million small business threshold and the seller has consented through eCitizen.

For businesses operating across jurisdictions, the key practical difference is in eligibility scope. In the EU, a buyer and supplier can agree to self-billing for any supply type without requiring government approval. In Australia, the arrangement must fall within the Commissioner's Determination — the supply must be a taxable supply, and the buyer must be a government related entity, a large business entity, or the party that determines the value. A business that uses self-billing for a particular supply type in Germany or the Netherlands cannot assume the same arrangement qualifies for RCTI treatment in Australia without confirming it is covered by LI 2023/20. Despite these structural differences, the underlying principle is the same: shifting invoice creation responsibility to the party best positioned to determine the supply's value.