India TDS on Invoice Payments: 2025-26 Rate Chart

An India TDS on invoice payments rate chart is only useful if you start with the right decision order: identify the nature of payment, check whether the threshold has been crossed, confirm the supplier's PAN status, and then see whether GST is separately shown on the invoice. For FY 2025-26, common invoice-linked rates include Section 194C at 1% or 2%, Section 194H at 2%, Section 194I at 2% or 10%, Section 194J at 2% or 10%, and Section 194Q at 0.1% above Rs 50 lakh. GST TDS under Section 51 is a separate 2% regime that applies only to specified deductors such as government entities and certain notified bodies.

That distinction matters in practice. Income Tax TDS is driven by the character of the payment and the relevant section under the Income-tax Act. GST TDS is driven by the deductor profile and Section 51 conditions under GST. A private company paying a professional fee may have Income Tax TDS but no GST TDS. A notified government buyer may need to consider both.

For a quick working reference, start with the main invoice-relevant sections below. The Income Tax Department's official AY 2026-27 TDS rate table lists resident payment rates including Section 194C at 1% for individuals and HUFs and 2% for others, Section 194H at 2%, Section 194-I at 2% for plant and machinery and 10% for land, building, furniture, or fittings, Section 194J at 2% for technical services and 10% for most other professional fees, and Section 194Q at 0.1% on purchases above Rs 50 lakh.

Section	Typical invoice context	Rate with PAN	Key threshold or trigger
194C	Contractor or work-contract payments	1% for individual or HUF payees, 2% for others	Rs 30,000 single payment or Rs 1,00,000 aggregate
194J	Professional or technical services	10% for most professional fees, 2% for technical services and specified cases	Rs 50,000
194H	Commission or brokerage	2%	Rs 20,000
194I	Rent	2% for plant or machinery, 10% for land, building, furniture, or fittings	Rs 50,000 per month
194Q	Purchase of goods	0.1% on value exceeding Rs 50 lakh	Buyer's turnover above Rs 10 crore and annual purchase threshold crossed
194IA	Purchase of immovable property	1%	Consider when transfer value is Rs 50 lakh or more

Use that table as the entry point, not the entire answer. The harder compliance work is deciding which section the invoice really belongs to, whether the deductible base should exclude GST, whether a missing PAN pushes the rate higher under Section 206AA, and whether the buyer is also a GST TDS deductor under Section 51.

---

How to Choose the Right Income Tax TDS Section from an Invoice

The cleanest way to classify invoice payments is to start with what the supplier is being paid for, not with the rate table. Most AP mistakes happen when teams jump to a familiar section before they confirm whether the invoice is for contract work, professional services, commission, rent, goods, or property.

Use this payer-side sequence:

1. Read the invoice description and supporting contract together. If the payment is for execution of work, labor, fabrication, transport, or another contractual service, Section 194C is often the first checkpoint.
2. Ask whether the fee is professional or technical in nature. Legal, consulting, audit, engineering, design, or similar specialist services often point to Section 194J, but the rate may differ depending on the service category.
3. Check whether the invoice is actually commission or brokerage. If the supplier is earning a facilitation or agency-based fee, Section 194H may be the right section rather than 194C or 194J.
4. Separate rent from services. A recurring invoice for premises, equipment, plant, machinery, furniture, or fittings can move the payment into Section 194I even when the invoice arrives through the same vendor account used for other services.
5. Treat purchase-of-goods invoices as a separate branch. Section 194Q is not a generic purchase deduction. You need both the buyer-turnover condition and the annual purchase threshold to be relevant.
6. Flag property transfers early. If the payment relates to immovable property rather than ordinary vendor billing, Section 194IA sits outside the usual AP services workflow and deserves its own review path.

This is why invoice classification cannot rely on the vendor name alone. The same supplier can send different invoice types across the year, and the correct section may change with the payment context. A facilities vendor might raise a rent invoice under Section 194I one month and a repair contract invoice under Section 194C the next. A consultant may bill professional services under Section 194J while a referral partner earns commission under Section 194H.

Threshold checks also sit inside the classification step. A section may describe the payment correctly, but deduction does not start until the statutory trigger is crossed. For recurring vendors, that means year-to-date tracking matters as much as the current invoice. AP teams should review invoice data, vendor master records, purchase order context, and cumulative vendor totals before they decide the section and release the payment.

When to Deduct on the Pre-GST Value and What Changes Without PAN

Once you know the Income Tax TDS section, the next question is the deduction base. In many invoice workflows, TDS should be calculated on the amount excluding GST when GST is shown separately on the invoice. That treatment follows the CBDT approach used by finance teams to avoid deducting tax on a clearly separated indirect-tax component.

The practical rule is straightforward:

• If the invoice shows the taxable value and GST as separate lines, calculate Income Tax TDS on the pre-GST amount.
• If the invoice presents only one combined amount and the GST component is not separately identifiable, teams often end up deducting on the gross invoice value because the tax element is not separately carved out.

For example, if a contractor invoice shows Rs 1,00,000 as the taxable value plus Rs 18,000 GST, Section 194C is generally applied to Rs 1,00,000, not Rs 1,18,000. If the same invoice is issued as one bundled Rs 1,18,000 amount with no separate GST disclosure, the payer loses that clean separation and the deduction calculation becomes less favorable.

That is one reason invoice format matters operationally. If your suppliers fall under GST e-invoicing rules, India's GST e-invoicing and IRN workflow requirements are relevant because clean tax breakout improves both compliance review and deduction accuracy.

The second major calculation issue is PAN status. Under Section 206AA, many invoice-linked TDS deductions can move to 20% if the payee does not provide a valid PAN. That does not mean every payment automatically becomes a flat 20% case in every scenario, but it is a serious control point for AP teams because the no-PAN consequence is far more expensive than the normal resident rate under sections such as 194C, 194H, 194I, or 194J.

In practice, finance teams should not wait until payment day to discover a missing PAN. The control belongs upstream: validate PAN during vendor onboarding, store it in the supplier master, and make sure the invoice review process flags any mismatch before the payment file is approved.

When GST TDS Under Section 51 Applies

GST TDS under Section 51 of the CGST Act is a separate compliance regime from Income Tax TDS. It is not triggered just because an invoice contains GST, and it does not apply to every business paying a supplier invoice.

At a working level, AP teams should check three things:

1. Is the buyer a specified deductor? The rule is aimed at government departments, local authorities, public sector undertakings, and other notified bodies or entities that hold the relevant GST TDS responsibility.
2. Has the contract value exceeded Rs 2.5 lakh, excluding taxes? The threshold test is applied to the contract value, not simply the one invoice total in isolation.
3. What is the GST structure of the transaction? GST TDS is 2% overall, split as 1% CGST plus 1% SGST for intra-state transactions or 2% IGST for inter-state transactions.

If those conditions are met, the buyer must treat GST TDS as its own deduction stream. The compliance trail runs through the GST Portal within the wider CBIC-administered framework, not through the Income Tax return chain. The deductor reports the deduction in Form GSTR-7, and the supplier receives the certificate through Form GSTR-7A. That makes GSTIN accuracy and entity-level GST setup important in a way that is different from ordinary Income Tax TDS handling.

Two operational points are easy to miss. First, nil GSTR-7 is not mandatory when no GST TDS is deducted in the tax period, so teams should avoid filing assumptions that create unnecessary work. Second, from the September 2025 return period onward, the portal workflow captures invoice-level details, which means invoice references need to be clean and traceable inside the buyer's process.

The main compliance mistake here is over-application. Many private-sector AP teams should be asking, "Are we even a Section 51 deductor?" before they ask, "What GST TDS rate applies?" If the entity does not fall into the specified deductor bucket, the GST TDS branch of the workflow stops there.

---

Income Tax TDS vs GST TDS on the Same Invoice Payment

The easiest way to reduce confusion is to compare the two regimes side by side.

Question	Income Tax TDS	GST TDS
What triggers it?	Nature of payment, relevant section, threshold, and PAN status	Section 51 deductor status plus GST contract threshold
Who deducts it?	Any payer covered by the relevant Income Tax section	Only specified GST deductors
What amount does it apply to?	Usually the payment value for the relevant section, often excluding GST when GST is separately shown	Contract-related GST TDS base under the GST rules
Where is it reported?	Quarterly TDS return chain such as Form 26Q	Form GSTR-7 on the GST Portal
What does the payee receive?	Income Tax credit, often supported by Form 16A for the deduction certificate	GST TDS credit through the GST system, supported by GSTR-7A

One invoice can attract both deductions. For example, a government body paying a contractor may need to deduct Income Tax TDS under Section 194C and also deduct GST TDS because the buyer is a specified Section 51 deductor. Those deductions do not cancel each other out, and one does not replace the other.

The important distinction is that the credits live in different systems. Income Tax TDS feeds the deductee's income-tax reporting chain and certificate trail. GST TDS feeds the deductee's indirect-tax credit position. That is why reconciliation needs to be explicit about which deduction was posted where, especially when vendor queries arise after payment.

If your team needs a comparative workflow example outside India, a comparable withholding-tax invoice workflow with GST interaction shows the same operational pattern: one tax rule determines whether withholding applies, while GST treatment follows its own logic and reporting path.

The recurring AP risk is assuming that "TDS" is a single concept. In invoice operations, it is better to ask two separate questions: Which Income Tax section applies to this payment? and Does this buyer also fall under GST TDS rules?

---

AP Checklist for Threshold Tracking, Returns, and Common Errors

For a payable team, the safest approach is to turn the TDS analysis into a repeatable control checklist:

1. Classify the payment type. Decide whether the invoice is for contract work, professional services, commission, rent, goods, or property before you look at the rate.
2. Confirm supplier identity data. Validate the legal name, PAN, and where relevant the GSTIN, against the vendor master.
3. Check the threshold position. Review both the current invoice and year-to-date totals so you do not miss aggregate triggers.
4. Review the invoice structure. If GST is separately shown, calculate the Income Tax TDS base on the pre-GST value where that rule applies.
5. Ask whether GST TDS is relevant to the buyer. Do not assume Section 51 applies just because the invoice is taxable under GST.
6. Post the deduction with the right compliance trail. Income Tax TDS and GST TDS need separate reporting, certificate, and reconciliation handling.

After deduction, the follow-up matters just as much as the rate selection. Income Tax TDS normally flows into the quarterly return and certificate cycle, including Form 26Q and the relevant certificate record such as Form 16A for many payment types. GST TDS, where applicable, runs through GSTR-7 and GSTR-7A. The more vendor payments you process, the more important it becomes to maintain year-to-date vendor threshold tracking instead of handling each tax invoice as a standalone event.

The most common errors are predictable:

• using an outdated rate chart or stale threshold
• deducting on the gross amount even though GST is separately shown
• discovering too late that the supplier's PAN is missing
• assuming GST TDS applies to every business payer
• failing to tie the deduction back to the right filing and certificate workflow

This is also where adjacent document controls matter. If your team handles goods movement documents alongside invoices, how India's e-way bill rules fit into invoice and dispatch controls is a useful parallel example of why clean invoice data and linked compliance records reduce downstream mistakes.

A rate chart gets you to the right neighborhood. A defensible AP process combines invoice data, vendor data, and cumulative payment tracking before the payment is released.